You are currently viewing all the available posts that are members of the Financial Markets Overview category.

Archive for the ‘Financial Markets Overview’ Category

Frankfurt’s Infineon Comes Up Short

Monday, July 5, 2010
posted by Eyal

Here is Frankfurt’s one and only INFINEON TECH, who has recently started a new upwards trend.  Upon first glance at the chart below, it is my gut reaction to say “good time to buy”  because it has indeed hit the supporting upwards trend line and should be at an optimum price for a strong buy.  But technical factors, and too many of them, are in the way.

For one, a very natural line can be drawn above the current trend.  This and the line of the trend itself form a pattern we call an opening fan.  These can become unstable as they run their course and for the short term, these 6 weeks are enough.  The pattern is expected to break soon and it will probably be in the downwards direction because several technical factors are here to influence this.

For one, the Moving Average 5 has been crossed by the MA 21 and the MA 13 is on its way to do the same.  Five days ago the Directional Movement DI+(blue) crossed the DI-(pink) going downwards, a clear sell signal.  And the Price Oscillator shows a slope down to zero and heading into negative territory, this being another strong sell signal.  Add to this failure to be supported at current levels, and the fact that the nearest support below is at 4.43, about 10% below current market price, and here you have a good case for a sell-short position on this darling equity.

This is the way the Chart looks:

Print Friendly

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Orkut
  • MySpace
  • Add to favorites
  • Google

A Market Forecast That Says ‘Take Cover’

Sunday, July 4, 2010
posted by Eyal

With the stock market lurching again, plenty of investors are nervous, and some are downright bearish. Then there’s Robert Prechter, the market forecaster and social theorist, who is in another league entirely.

Mr. Prechter is convinced that we have entered a market decline of staggering proportions — perhaps the biggest of the last 300 years. In a series of phone conversations and e-mail exchanges last week, he said that no other forecaster was likely to accept his reasoning, which is based on his version of the Elliott Wave theory — a technical approach to market analysis that he embraces with evangelical fervor.

Originating in the writings of Ralph Nelson Elliott, an obscure accountant who found repetitive patterns, or “fractals,” in the stock market of the 1930s and  -40s, the theory suggests that an epic downswing is under way, Mr. Prechter said. But he argued that even skeptical investors should take his advice seriously.

“I’m saying: ‘Winter is coming. Buy a coat,’ ” he said. “Other people are advising people to stay naked. If I’m wrong, you’re not hurt. If they’re wrong, you’re dead. It’s pretty benign advice to opt for safety for a while.”

His advice: individual investors should move completely out of the market and hold cash and cash equivalents, like Treasury bills, for years to come. (For traders with a fair amount of skill and willingness to embrace risk, he suggests other alternatives, like shorting the market or making bets on volatility.) But ultimately, “the decline will lead to one of the best investment opportunities ever,” he said.

Buy-and-hold stock investors will be devastated in a crash much worse than the declines of 2008 and early 2009 or the worst years of the Great Depression or the Panic of 1873, he predicted.

For a rough parallel, he said, go all the way back to England and the collapse of the South Sea Bubble in 1720, a crash that deterred people “from buying stocks for 100 years,” he said. This time, he said, “If I’m right, it will be such a shock that people will be telling their grand kids many years from now, ‘Don’t touch stocks.’ ”

The Dow, which now stands at 9,686.48, is likely to fall well below 1,000 over perhaps five or six years as a grand market cycle comes to an end, he said. That unraveling, combined with a depression and deflation, will make anyone holding cash “extremely grateful for their prudence.”

Mr. Prechter is hardly the only market hand to advocate prudence now, but nearly everyone else foresees a much rosier future, once current difficulties are past.

For example, Ralph J. Acampora, a market analyst with more than 40 years of experience, said he moved entirely out of stocks and into cash late last month. Now a partner at Alverita, a wealth management firm in New York, he said recent setbacks suggested that the market would drop another 10 or 15 percent, probably until September or October, before resuming another “meaningful rally.”

Over the next several years Mr. Acampora expects an “old normal market,” characterized by relatively short-lived swings that will provide many opportunities for smart investors — one that resembles the markets of the 1960s and 70s. “I’ve lived through it,” he said.

Like Mr. Prechter, he is a past president of the Market Technicians Association, the leading organization of technical market analysts, and he said that his colleague has done “some very good work.” But Mr. Acampora doesn’t agree with Mr. Prechter’s long-term theories, either intellectually or emotionally.

The “mathematics don’t work,” Mr. Acampora said, because such a big decline would imply that individual stocks would need to trade at unrealistically low levels. Furthermore, he said, “I don’t want to agree with him, because if he’s right, we’ve basically got to go to the mountains with a gun and some soup cans, because it’s all over.”

Still, on a “near-term” basis, he said, “We’re probably saying the same thing.”

Similarly, Larry Berman, who co-founded ETF Capital Management in Toronto and recently ended his term as the president of the technicians association, says he sees a “classic” short-term negative market trend developing now. But he doesn’t use the Elliott Wave theory, saying Mr. Prechter is trying to “measure the market in decades, which is too long a time frame for practical trading purposes or for risk management.”

Mr. Prechter, 61, lives in Gainesville, Ga., where he runs Elliott Wave International, a forecasting and publishing firm. He graduated from Yale as a psychology major in 1971,dabbled as a singer, drummer and songwriter in a rock band and became a technical analyst for Merrill Lynch.

He became fascinated by Mr. Elliott’s writings, which suggest that the market moves in predictable if complex patterns. Along with A. J. Frost, Mr. Prechter wrote “Elliott Wave Principle,” a 1978 book that predicted the emergence of a great bull market — a forecast that was largely fulfilled. By 1987, he was widely regarded as an expert in technical analysis. Articles in The New York Times said he was known as “the market’s leading technical guru” — and more. An article in October that year said he had “emerged as both prophet and deity, an adviser whose advice reaches so many investors that he tends to pull the market the way he has predicted it will move.”

He has far less day-to-day influence now, after years spent developing a theory he calls “socionomics,” which holds “social moods” as the cause not only of market cycles but also of economic and political events. A grand cycle is ending, he says, and the time for reckoning is near.

In 2002, he published “Conquer the Crash,” which predicted misery ahead. Even so, he said in 2008 that the market would soon rally sharply — then said late last year that stocks were about to fall and that the great decline would resume.

Since 1980, the advice in his investing newsletters, when converted into a portfolio, has slightly underperformed the overall stock market but has been much less risky, losing money in only one calendar year, according to calculations by The Hulbert Financial Digest. Mr. Prechter said he disagreed with the methodology used in these measurements, but offered none of his own.

For his part, Mr. Acampora says that the Elliott Wave has some validity as an indicator but that “it’s only part of the story” of technical market analysis, which also needs to be buttressed by economic and fundamental research.

Mr. Prechter says his unifying theory, socionomics, is a “young science.”

“We’re quantifying it,” he said. “We’re working on it.” In the meantime, he contends, it has enabled him to “look around the corner” and prepare for a dangerous future.

Print Friendly

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Orkut
  • MySpace
  • Add to favorites
  • Google
Comments Off

Goldman As Humpty Dumpty

Sunday, July 4, 2010
posted by Eyal

Goldman Sachs’ disastrously unfortunate year is halfway over, and questions about its conduct during the credit crisis linger on Wall Street and in Washington. The firm has made plenty of money, of course, amid the political criticisms and federal investigations questioning its ethics and business practices. But Goldman has lost something money can’t buy, something vital that must be reclaimed. And it isn’t just a big chunk of its reputation that’s at stake. Goldman has lost that special something that has always made its long-term greediness, to use a late chairman’s phrase, seem special, and that made the firm appear smarter than other banks. Indeed, that quality helped Goldman command top dollar, euro and yen for its services. Now, Goldman seems to be in danger of being viewed like any other bank, except somehow suspect for performing too well during the credit crisis. Wall Street knows any investment professional who is any good at what he does encounters potential conflicts, and the expectation is that those conflicts should be handled appropriately. If Goldman proves to have failed in this regard, its stock (ticker: GS), recently at $132, could be taken down a few more notches.

The shares already have been bashed, having fallen 23% during the past two years. They are wilting ahead of the second-quarter earnings release, scheduled for July 20. Analysts are lowering earnings estimates, and expectations suggest even Goldman’s stable of star traders had difficulty, like everyone else, making money in the second quarter.

As this harsh year for Goldman began, the bank seemed unable to extricate itself from a leading role in a polarizing post-credit-crisis news cycle. At the time, Goldman was preparing to pay $16 billion in staff bonuses, which indicated political tone-deafness and an arrogance that seemed to bode poorly as the financial crisis entered the recrimination phase that always occurs after Main Street has lost a lot of money on Wall Street.

There are always rumors that Goldman — which might have done absolutely nothing wrong, remember — will settle some sort of case with federal investigators, which could boost its stock price.

Goldman could say something on its earnings call that makes its troubles seem manageable, or it could even reveal massive profits and an optimistic view of the future that overshadows everything. In the markets, making lots of money always does that.

But, most likely, Goldman will end the call with a reputation that still isn’t commensurate with its distinguished past. Fixing Goldman’s public image is a huge challenge for the company’s chief executive, Lloyd Blankfein. For now, Goldman seems destined to remain Wall Street’s version of Humpty Dumpty, who, as everyone knows, suffered a big fall.

Should all the king’s horses and all the king’s men fail to put Goldman’s reputation together again, Blankfein will preside over a company that has become like any other bank, and that could be quite bad as Wall Street seems more and more like an assembly line.

Print Friendly

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Orkut
  • MySpace
  • Add to favorites
  • Google